loading…
Search for a command to run...
loading…
Historical stock pattern intelligence for AI agents. Search 24M pre-computed chart pattern embeddings across 15K stocks and 10 years. 19 tools: pattern similari
Historical stock pattern intelligence for AI agents. Search 24M pre-computed chart pattern embeddings across 15K stocks and 10 years. 19 tools: pattern similarity search, forward returns, regime analysis, anomaly detection, sector rotation, earnings reactions, correlation shifts, scenario analysis, and more. Returns what happened historically when charts looked like this — compliance-safe
PyPI License: MIT Glama Score MCP Registry Tools
Works with: Claude Desktop | Claude Code | ChatGPT | GitHub Copilot | Cursor | VS Code | Any MCP client
Cohort intelligence engine for stock chart patterns — give your AI agent the cohort of historical analogs, the full forward-return distribution, and the features that separated winners from losers. Calibrated, methodology-honest, no overstated confidence.
📖 What is cohort intelligence? · 🛠️ Full MCP setup guide · 🤖 Build an AI trading agent with Claude
25M+ pattern embeddings. 10 years of history. 19K+ stocks. One tool call.
> "What does NVDA's chart on 2024-08-05 1h look like historically?"
NVDA · 2024-08-05 · 1h — cohort of 500 historical analogs
(485 with realized 5-day returns)
Distribution at 5 days forward:
median: −1.3%
p10 ·· p90: −11.3% ·· +6.8% (80% empirical band)
win rate: 44%
cohort_score: 0.31 (modest)
Features that separated winners from losers:
+ credit_spread_state = tight
+ macro_state = bullish
+ pct_off_52w_low (further off)
− vol_regime = low
Summary: NVDA's 1-hour pattern on 2024-08-05 has 500 historical
analogs. The cohort's 5-day distribution is bearish-leaning
(median −1.3%, win rate 44%) — the historical record does NOT
show this pattern typically resolving bullish. Conditioning on
tight credit spreads and a bullish macro state would have
separated the outperformers within the cohort.
A retrieval, not a forecast. No hallucinated predictions. No cherry-picking. Just the empirical record your agent can cite.
pip install chartlibrary-mcp
Download the chart-library-6.1.0.mcpb extension file and open it with Claude Desktop for automatic installation.
claude mcp add chart-library -- chartlibrary-mcp
Add to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"chart-library": {
"command": "chartlibrary-mcp",
"env": {
"CHART_LIBRARY_API_KEY": "cl_your_key"
}
}
}
}
Add to .cursor/mcp.json or VS Code MCP settings:
{
"servers": {
"chart-library": {
"command": "chartlibrary-mcp",
"env": {
"CHART_LIBRARY_API_KEY": "cl_your_key"
}
}
}
}
Add to .vscode/mcp.json in your project (this file is already included in the chart-library repos):
{
"servers": {
"chart-library": {
"command": "chartlibrary-mcp",
"env": {
"CHART_LIBRARY_API_KEY": "cl_your_key"
}
}
}
}
Copilot Chat will auto-detect the MCP server when you open the project. Use @mcp in Copilot Chat to invoke tools.
ChatGPT connects to MCP servers via remote HTTP endpoints. To set up:
https://chartlibrary.io/mcpNote: The remote endpoint at
https://chartlibrary.io/mcpuses Streamable HTTP transport. If you need SSE fallback, usehttps://chartlibrary.io/mcp/sse.
For any MCP client that supports remote HTTP connections:
https://chartlibrary.io/mcp
This endpoint supports both Streamable HTTP and SSE transports, no local installation required.
Free tier: 200 calls/day, no credit card required. Get an API key at chartlibrary.io/developers or use basic search without one.
> search(query="TSLA") → cohort_id
> explain(cohort_id=..., style="position_guidance")
Signal: HOLD
Of the historical analogs to this setup, those that exited early
avoided a drawdown 3/10 of the time; those that held gained a
further +2.1% median over the next 5 days. No exit signal triggered
— the cohort's record leans toward continuation, not reversal.
> context(target="market")
Sector relative strength (30-day):
Leaders: XLK Technology +4.2% · XLY Cons. Disc. +3.1% · XLC Comm. +2.8%
Laggards: XLU Utilities −1.4% · XLP Cons. Staples −2.1% · XLRE Real Estate −3.3%
Regime: Risk-On (growth > defensives), SPY above 20d, VIX mid-band.
> search(query="AMD 2024-06-18") → cohort_id
> cohort_groupby(cohort_id=..., by="ctx_spy_trend_20d")
AMD's cohort, split by the SPY trend at each analog's date:
SPY weak (bottom quartile): median 5d −5.2% · p10/p90 −11.4%/+1.1% · 18% positive
SPY strong (top quartile): median 5d +2.6% · p10/p90 −3.1%/+8.4% · 61% positive
A distribution conditioned on the tape — historical analogs, not a beta forecast.
Chart Library v6 exposes the same granular surface as the remote server at chartlibrary.io/mcp — so the pip package, the Claude connector, and the REST API all use the same tool names. The core loop is search → pull_comps → cohort_introspect. Chain tools via the comp_set_id / cohort_id handle for sub-second refinement without re-running kNN.
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
search |
Entry point. Find similar historical patterns for an anchor; returns a comp-set handle you can chain. mode= supports text (default), live_bars (raw OHLCV), similar (cohort-level neighbors). |
pull_comps |
The flagship. Pull the comp set for a subject (symbol, date, timeframe) — the historical analogs, what they did next, the drivers that separated the best outcomes, and our coverage_record. Front-of-house lexicon: subject · comp_set_id · comp_count · comp_strength · match_quality · drivers · up_rate · conditions (calm / normal / stressed). Same engine as cohort_analyze with the new vocabulary applied at the boundary. |
cohort_analyze |
Same engine as pull_comps under the original field names (cohort_id, feature_importance, win_rate, vol_regime, …). Kept callable verbatim for existing integrations; new ones should prefer pull_comps. |
cohort_introspect |
Slice/probe a stored comp set by ANY attribute (macro · technical · event) and get per-subset stats vs the full-cohort baseline. No kNN re-run. "Of the 300 analogs, how do the post-earnings-week ones do?" |
cohort_attribution |
Within-cohort winner/loser attribution — which member traits separated the forward-return tail from the rest, each with a by-date cluster-bootstrap CI and a false-discovery decision. Descriptive, never causal. |
track_record |
Historical predicted-vs-realized coverage of our calibrated bands (a track record, not a forecast). The nominal 80% band held 80.8% across 302,880 prior cases. |
symbol_intelligence |
Layer 5 memory — per-symbol feature reliability + achieved calibration across prior analyses. Ground a read in whether a feature has historically been reliable for this ticker. |
analyze |
Analytic metrics. metric= accepts anomaly, volume_profile, crowding, correlation_shift, earnings_reaction, pattern_degradation, regime_accuracy, decompose (slice winners vs losers), clusters (cohort-internal grouping). |
context |
Situational data. target= accepts "market", a ticker symbol ("NVDA"), {"symbol": ..., "date": ...} for lightweight anchor metadata, or "system" for DB coverage. |
explain |
Narrative + rankings derived from a cohort. style= accepts filter_ranking (which filter shifts the distribution most), prose (plain-English summary), position_guidance (exit signals), risk_ranking. |
portfolio |
Multi-holding weighted conditional distribution. Runs per-holding cohorts in parallel, weight-averages the distributions, ranks tail contributors. |
report_feedback |
File an error or improvement suggestion back to the project. |
Full-cohort handover — hand the raw cohort back so you can bucket/sort by your objective, not our default lens:
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
cohort_members |
The full cohort, one record per analog, with rich per-member metadata (forward outcomes, regime, anchor fundamentals, news, chart events). Slice and bucket it yourself. |
cohort_groupby |
Partition the cohort by one dimension (vol_regime, sector_etf, momentum_5d, …) → per-bucket outcome distributions vs baseline. The one-call "does this dimension matter?" primitive. |
cohort_rerank |
Reorder the cohort by a weighted composite of member fields you name (e.g. "ret_5d:1,distance:-0.5") — impose your objective on the analogs, fully auditable. |
These tools replace hallucinated "on average this pattern returns X%" with real conditional base rates. The full distinction — what they do and how to read responses — is documented at /concepts/cohort-intelligence and /concepts/reading-a-cohort-response.
1. search(query="NVDA 2024-06-18") → comp_set_id
2. pull_comps(symbol="NVDA", date="2024-06-18",
filters={"vol_regime": ["high"]})
→ comp set: distribution + drivers
3. cohort_introspect(cohort_id=...,
where={"events.days_since_earnings": {"max": 5}})
→ how the post-earnings subset did
4. cohort_groupby(cohort_id=..., by="sector_etf") → outcome split by sector
v6 converges on the granular naming the live remote/connector surface already used. The v5 umbrella tools — cohort (depth=), discover (mode=), narrative (mode=), and decision_brief — are now deprecated but still callable, so existing code keeps working. cohort(depth="full") forwards to cohort_analyze. New agents should reach for the canonical tools above.
| v5 umbrella call (deprecated) | v6 canonical |
|---|---|
cohort(depth="full", ...) |
cohort_analyze(...) |
cohort(depth="basic", cohort_id=...) then slice |
cohort_introspect(cohort_id=..., where={...}) |
cohort(depth="compare", compare_with={...}) |
cohort_compare(...) (still callable) |
portfolio(mode="symbol_intel", symbol=...) |
symbol_intelligence(symbol=...) |
| `discover(mode="picks" | "daily_setups")` |
| `narrative(mode="pulse" | "alerts")` |
The v4-era granular aliases (cohort_compare, decompose, clusters, live_search, similar_cohorts, anchor_fetch, narrative_pulse, narrative_alerts, discover_picks, get_daily_setups) remain deprecated-but-callable and forward to the canonical surface.
The v3-era tools (search_charts, get_cohort_distribution, analyze_pattern, etc.) were removed in v5. If your code still calls them, pin chartlibrary-mcp<5.0.0 until you migrate. The mapping:
| Legacy (removed in v5) | Replacement |
|---|---|
search_charts, search_batch, get_discover_picks |
search |
get_cohort_distribution, refine_cohort_with_filters, run_scenario, get_regime_win_rates, compare_to_peers |
cohort_analyze (+ cohort_introspect to refine) |
detect_anomaly, get_volume_profile, get_crowding, get_earnings_reaction, get_correlation_shift, get_pattern_degradation, get_regime_accuracy |
analyze (metric=) |
get_sector_rotation, get_status, get_market_context |
context |
get_pattern_summary, explain_cohort_filters, get_exit_signal, get_risk_adjusted_picks |
explain (style=) |
get_portfolio_health |
portfolio |
analyze_pattern, get_follow_through, check_ticker |
search + cohort_analyze |
Chart Library indexes a large library of historical chart patterns and exposes them behind a conditional-distribution API. Every query returns sample sizes, percentiles, and calibrated forward-return bands — never a point forecast.
When your agent calls search("NVDA") and chains cohort_analyze, the server:
The result: factual, citation-ready statements like "out of N similar historical patterns, the median 5-day return was X% (80% band [p10, p90])" that your agent can present without hallucinating or hedging.
| Tier | Calls/day | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Sandbox | 200 | Free |
| Builder | 5,000 | $29/mo |
| Scale | 50,000 | $99/mo |
Get your key at chartlibrary.io/developers.
export CHART_LIBRARY_API_KEY=cl_your_key
Chart Library's privacy policy is published at chartlibrary.io/privacy and covers:
The MCP server itself sends only the arguments of your tool calls to chartlibrary.io (no local file or directory contents, no clipboard, no browser history). Your CHART_LIBRARY_API_KEY is sent only as a Bearer header to authenticate with the chart-library API.
report_feedback) only writes back to chart-library's own feedback inbox and never touches your system.Report security issues to [email protected].
MIT. See LICENSE.
Chart Library provides historical pattern data for informational purposes. Not financial advice.
Run in your terminal:
claude mcp add chart-library -- npx CSA PROJECT - FZCO © 2026 IFZA Business Park, DDP, Premises Number 31174 - 001
Security
Low riskAutomated heuristic from public metadata — not a security guarantee.