Erc8004 Agent Liveness
БесплатноНе проверенEnables users to verify whether an ERC-8004-registered agent is currently reachable by resolving its on-chain registration and performing a live MCP handshake,
Описание
Enables users to verify whether an ERC-8004-registered agent is currently reachable by resolving its on-chain registration and performing a live MCP handshake, returning verdicts such as REGISTERED_UNREACHABLE or AGENT_NOT_FOUND.
README
Checks whether an agent registered in the real ERC-8004 "Trustless Agents" Identity Registry (Base Sepolia testnet) is actually alive right now -- not just that it was registered once. NEXUS candidate #10 -- manual build, not FORGE-generated, same manual-Cloud-Run-asset pattern as candidates #3/#4/#6/#8/#9/#13/#16.
POST /verify-registered-agent {"agent_id": 3}-- $0.10/call.- MCP tool
verify_registered_agentat/mcp, same params -- currently free, see "Known limitations". GET /health,GET /.well-known/agent-card.json,GET /openapi.json(hasx-payment-info),GET /.well-known/402index-verify.txt(402index claim verification file).
What this is (and why registration alone isn't enough)
ERC-8004 is a real, live Ethereum standard for on-chain agent
identity: an agent mints an ERC-721 token in an IdentityRegistry, whose tokenURI points to an off-chain
registration file (JSON: name, description, declared endpoints, active flag, supported trust methods). It
went live on Ethereum mainnet 2026-01-29, with reference deployments on Base mainnet and Base/Ethereum/Linea
Sepolia testnets. Registration is a one-time on-chain action -- a real registered agent can go completely
dark (process killed, domain expired, endpoint changed) while its on-chain record persists unchanged forever.
This asset closes that gap: it resolves the real on-chain registration AND performs a real MCP initialize
handshake against whatever endpoint the registration declares, right now, at call time -- the same
liveness-vs-registration distinction agent-verification-api (candidate #3) already draws for
domain-claimed identities, applied here to on-chain-registered ones.
Grounding (verified live this session, not assumed from any single source)
- Contract addresses, initially from a third-party summary, verified independently via
eth_getCodeagainsthttps://sepolia.base.orgbefore being trusted:IdentityRegistry(0x8004A818BFB912233c491871b3d84c89A494BD9e) andReputationRegistry(0x8004B663056A597Dffe9eCcC1965A193B7388713) both have real, non-empty deployed bytecode. - ABI, pulled from the reference implementation (
github.com/erc-8004/erc-8004-contracts/abis), tested live against 3 real registered agents (agentId1-3) before being trusted for this asset:- Agent 1's
tokenURIresolves to adata:application/json;base64,...URI. - Agent 2's resolves to
ipfs://bafkreiff.... - Agent 3's resolves to a real
https://api.snack.money/agent/.../registration.jsonURL. All 3 of ERC-8004's real URI schemes confirmed working live, not just the one the spec's own examples show.
- Agent 1's
getSummaryrequires a non-emptyclientAddressesarray -- confirmed live (reverts with"clientAddresses required"otherwise). This asset callsgetClients(agentId)first and only callsgetSummaryif that returns at least one address; agents with zero feedback correctly reportfeedback_count: 0without an RPC error.agentId=999999(a real nonexistent token) correctly reverts with a custom error, confirmed live -- mapped toAGENT_NOT_FOUND, not a crash.
MCP handshake engine: reused, not reimplemented
Per the task brief's explicit instruction, _nexus_validate_public_url, _nexus_no_redirect_mcp_http_client,
and _mcp_handshake_check are ported verbatim from manual_assets/agent-verification-api/main.py
(candidate #3) -- same SSRF pre-check, same no-redirect posture (the exact fix applied there after the
2026-08-22 security review found a redirect-based SSRF bypass), same bounded timeout. Not modified beyond the
asset-name constant. This asset's own contribution is upstream of that: resolving an ERC-8004 registration
file (3 URI schemes) and picking a real endpoint out of its endpoints array to hand to that engine.
Chain scope, on purpose
Base Sepolia testnet only -- same network every other x402 payment in this codebase already uses. ERC-8004 is also live on Base mainnet and Ethereum mainnet (verified live this session), but this asset doesn't expose a caller-selectable chain: no evidence a buyer needs mainnet for a 7-day probation candidate (CLAUDE.md SS3).
Deploy target: Cloud Run
Same pipeline as candidates #4/#3/#6/#8/#9/#13/#16 -- see skills/infra-deploy-ops.
# 1. First deploy -- PUBLIC_DOMAIN not known yet, every real request 421s until step 2.
./scripts/deploy_cloud_run.sh erc8004-agent-liveness manual_assets/erc8004-agent-liveness
# 2. Grab the printed *.run.app URL, then (only if it differs from env-vars.deploy.yaml's guess):
gcloud run services update erc8004-agent-liveness --region us-central1 --project nexus-505016 \
--update-env-vars PUBLIC_DOMAIN=<the-real-domain>
Known limitations (left unfixed on purpose -- CLAUDE.md SS3, no gate without evidence it's needed)
- MCP tool calls are not charged. Same in-process-call pattern as every other manual asset in this codebase.
active: falseshort-circuits toREGISTERED_INACTIVEeven if the endpoint is actually live. Trusts the registrant's own self-declaration over an independent liveness check in that one case -- an agent lying about being inactive (unusual incentive) would be misreported. Accepted:activeis the registrant's own signal by spec design, overriding it would be second-guessing the standard's own field.REGISTERED_UNREACHABLE(the opposite failure mode -- declared active, not actually reachable) is this asset's actual value-add and is NOT similarly short-circuited.- Endpoint selection is a heuristic, not a spec requirement. ERC-8004's
endpointsarray is free-form (anyname); this asset prefersmcp/x402/a2a/web(in that order) and falls back to the first entry. A registration using an unlistednamefor its only real MCP-capable endpoint would still be picked (name matching isn't the only path -- unnamed-preference fallback covers it), but a registration with MULTIPLE endpoints where none of the preferred names points to the live one could reportREGISTERED_UNREACHABLEbased on the wrong endpoint.
- Endpoint selection is a heuristic, not a spec requirement. ERC-8004's
- IPFS resolution uses a single public gateway (
ipfs.io). No fallback gateway -- a registration whose CID isn't pinned/reachable via that specific gateway reportsREGISTRATION_FETCH_FAILEDeven if the content exists on IPFS generally. - No per-caller rate limiting. Fine for a 7-day disposable measurement window.
reputationis a self-reported, ungated, un-staked signal. Any EVM address can callReputationRegistry.giveFeedbackfor anyagentId--feedback_count/average_valueare real on-chain numbers, but nothing stops an agent's own owner from Sybil-feeding themselves. Treat as an unverified signal, not a trust score (this caveat is also in thereputationfield's own description in the API schema, not just here).
Quality gate (2026-08-23, from design not retroactive)
Same 2-agent process as candidates #3/#4/#6/#8/#9/#13/#16 (security lens; functional+quality+buyer-experience lens), run before the first deploy. Real findings, all fixed before going live:
- Security (0 exploitable findings): confirmed the 3 functions ported verbatim from
agent-verification-api/main.py(_nexus_validate_public_url,_nexus_no_redirect_mcp_http_client,_mcp_handshake_check) carry the actual SSRF-redirect fix, byte-for-byte, and that the newhttps:///IPFS registration-fetch path applies the same defense one layer earlier, before any endpoint is extracted -- confirmed NOT to reintroduce that bug class. Two low/informational items, both addressed as defense-in-depth even though neither was a confirmed exploit: IPFS CID concatenation (confirmed live it couldn't escape theipfs.iohost, but now usesurllib.parse.quoteto confine it to a single path segment anyway), anddata:URI base64 decoding (confirmed linear/non-amplifying, no fix needed). - Functional/buyer-experience (1 must-fix, 1 medium, applied): a registration file whose top-level JSON
is a non-object (array/string/number -- registrant-controlled content) passed through as
"ok": Truewith a non-dictregistration, which every downstream consumer (_pick_liveness_endpoint,_classify_verdict, the response body) assumed was a dict -- an uncaughtAttributeErrorbecame an unhandled 500 after x402 payment had already settled. Fixed: both JSON-parse sites in_resolve_registration_filenow reject non-dict results asregistration_not_an_objectbefore returning"ok": True. Also added the reputation gameability caveat (see "Known limitations" above and thereputationfield's own schema description). Two low/nice-to-have items (duplicate-nameendpoint shadowing, unverified field casing on 2 optional registration keys) left as-is -- no evidence yet either matters for real registrations, consistent with CLAUDE.md SS3. - Verified end-to-end against real production data before AND after fixes: 4 real ERC-8004 agent IDs on Base
Sepolia (1, 2, 3, and a real nonexistent 999999) each produced the correct verdict --
REGISTERED_UNREACHABLE(real registration, endpoint doesn't answer MCP),REGISTRATION_FETCH_FAILEDx2 (a real IPFS gateway timeout, and a real deadhttps://registration URL -- both legitimate, not bugs), andAGENT_NOT_FOUND(real on-chain revert) -- plus real reputation data (74 feedback entries from 12 distinct clients on agent 1).
Measurement (candidate #10, 7-day window)
7-day window from 2026-08-23 (real deploy date) -> decision point 2026-08-30. Source of truth:
traffic_events/revenue_events/mcp_call_events (asset_name = 'erc8004-agent-liveness'), not Cloud Run
logs. Day 7: if zero real traffic (filtering crawlers), pause/delete the Cloud Run service
(gcloud run services delete erc8004-agent-liveness --region us-central1 --project nexus-505016).
Установка Erc8004 Agent Liveness
У этого сервера нет опубликованного пакета — он собирается из исходников. Открой репозиторий и следуй инструкции в README.
▸ github.com/nexus-mcp-infra/erc8004-agent-livenessFAQ
Erc8004 Agent Liveness MCP бесплатный?
Да, Erc8004 Agent Liveness MCP бесплатный — установка в пару кликов через Unyly без оплаты.
Нужен ли API-ключ для Erc8004 Agent Liveness?
Нет, Erc8004 Agent Liveness работает без API-ключей и переменных окружения.
Erc8004 Agent Liveness — hosted или self-hosted?
Доступен hosted-вариант: Unyly запускает сервер в облаке, локальная установка не обязательна.
Как установить Erc8004 Agent Liveness в Claude Desktop, Claude Code или Cursor?
Открой Erc8004 Agent Liveness на unyly.org, выбери вкладку своего клиента (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor) и нажми Install — конфиг сгенерируется автоматически, без правки JSON.
Похожие MCP
Fetch
Web content fetching and conversion for efficient LLM usage.
AWS KB Retrieval
Retrieval from AWS Knowledge Base using Bedrock Agent Runtime.
автор: modelcontextprotocolSpring AI MCP Server
Provides auto-configuration for setting up an MCP server in Spring Boot applications.
llm-analysis-assistant
A very streamlined mcp client that supports calling and monitoring stdio/sse/streamableHttp, and can also view request responses through the /logs page. It also
автор: xuzexin-hzMCP-Agent
A simple, composable framework to build agents using Model Context Protocol by [LastMile AI](https://www.lastmileai.dev)
автор: lastmile-aiSpring AI MCP Client
Provides auto-configuration for MCP client functionality in Spring Boot applications.
mcp.natoma.ai
A Hosted MCP Platform to discover, install, manage and deploy MCP servers by [Natoma Labs](https://www.natoma.ai)
MCPHub
Website to list high quality MCP servers and reviews by real users. Also provide online chatbot for popular LLM models with MCP server support.
MCP Servers Rating and User Reviews
Website to rate MCP servers, write authentic user reviews, and [search engine for agent & mcp](http://www.deepnlp.org/search/agent)
mkinf
An Open Source registry of hosted MCP Servers to accelerate AI agent workflows.
Compare Erc8004 Agent Liveness with
Не уверен что выбрать?
Найди свой стек за 60 секунд
Автор?
Embed-бейдж для README
Похожее
Все в категории ai
