Описание
Will this AI model fit on your Mac?
README
npm conformance license zero deps

Live: https://fitllm.run · Bilingual · Free · No ads · No login
Open engine: fitllm-engine (MIT · npm
fitllm-engine·npx fitllm)Zero dependencies. One readable file: engine.js. Conformance-vector tested. MIT.
npx fitllm "GLM-4.7-Flash" --gpu 4090 # ✓ FITS — 21.9/24 GB, free 2.1 GB
npx fitllm "gpt-oss-120b" --mac 64 # ✗ WON'T FIT → what to change to make it fit
npx fitllm "Qwen 3.6 35B" --gpu "5090 + 3090" # multi-GPU rig — VRAM pools (56GB), even mixed cards
npx fitllm --top --detect # what CAN this machine run? — best quant per model
npx fitllm --detect # reads this machine's real hardware
Why a CLI? The "will it run?" question is born in the terminal — one line before ollama pull. No install, no tab-switching, and it reads your actual hardware with --detect instead of asking you to know your VRAM. Exit code 0/1 makes it a pre-download guard:
# in your model-pull script — stop BEFORE the 40 GB download:
npx fitllm "gpt-oss-120b" --detect || { echo "won't fit — aborting pull"; exit 1; }
This is the open calculation core of FitLLM. The math is open so you can audit it.
Ask an LLM "does Qwen 3.6 fit my GPU?" and it pattern-matches to an architecture from its training cutoff — and usually says no. Catalog-based calculators lag new releases. FitLLM reads each model's official config.json live, so it's right on day-one releases and on the hybrid / sliding-window / MoE architectures that naive formulas get wrong.
Covers Apple Silicon unified memory (M1–M5, Pro/Max/Ultra — up to the 512GB Mac Studio), NVIDIA GPUs (RTX 20/30/40/50, workstation RTX 6000 Ada / RTX PRO 6000, datacenter A100/H100/H200/B200), AMD Radeon (RX 7000/9000, PRO W7900) and multi-GPU presets (2×3090, 2×4090, 4×3090) — with GGUF Q-tier weight quantization kept separate from KV-cache quantization. Every hardware number is cross-verified against ≥2 independent sources (source URLs embedded per-value in engine.js).
Why most LLM memory calculators are wrong
Almost every "can I run this LLM?" calculator estimates the KV cache with the textbook formula:
KV ≈ 2 × num_layers × num_kv_heads × head_dim × context_length × bytes
That assumes every layer keeps a full-context KV cache with one uniform head shape. True for Llama-1/2 — wrong for most 2025–2026 models:
| Model | What naive formulas miss | Naive KV | FitLLM KV | Off by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B @131K, 8-bit | 50 of 60 layers are sliding-window (keep only the last 1024 tokens); the 10 global layers use a different head shape (4 KV-heads × 512, not 16 × 256) | ~60 GB | ~5.4 GB | 11× |
| Qwen 3.6 27B @131K, 8-bit | 48 of 64 layers are linear attention (Gated DeltaNet) — no growing KV cache | ~16 GB | ~4 GB | 4× |
| GLM-4.7-Flash @128K, bf16 | MLA: K/V compressed into one shared latent (512+64 dims, cached once — not per-head K and V) | ~117 GB | ~6.6 GB | 17.8× |
| Plain dense (Llama, Mistral…) | nothing — standard transformer | same | same | 1× ✅ |
An 11× error flips the verdict: a naive calculator says Gemma 4 31B won't fit in 64 GB at long context, when it fits comfortably.
The five things they ignore
- Sliding-window attention (Gemma 2/3/4, gpt-oss): most layers only keep the last N tokens, so their KV stops growing. Only the global layers scale with full context.
- Hybrid / linear attention (Qwen 3.6, many 2026 models): linear-attention layers use a fixed-size recurrent state, not a growing KV cache.
- MLA — Multi-head Latent Attention (GLM-5.2, GLM-4.7-Flash, DeepSeek family): the cache is a single low-rank latent (
kv_lora_rank+ RoPE dims) shared across all heads — per-head "2 × heads × head_dim" formulas over-count by an order of magnitude. Verified against the DeepSeek-V2 paper (arXiv:2405.04434) and the official DeepSeek-V3 inference code. - Heterogeneous head dims + MoE: global layers can use a different
head_dim(Gemma 4: 512 vs 256). MoE keeps every expert in memory while activating only a few per token. - PLE — Per-Layer Embeddings (Gemma 4 e2b/e4b): llama.cpp keeps the
per_layer_token_embdtensor in system RAM by default regardless of-ngl(forcing it onto CUDA crashes for K-quant GGUFs; only non-K quants can opt in — ggml-org/llama.cpp#14430), so only the non-PLE weights need VRAM. Counting all 5.1B params against a GPU over-predicts e2b's resident weights by ~1.9× and flips small-card verdicts. On Apple Silicon system RAM is accelerator memory, so total params stay correct there. (Caveats: vLLM loads PLE fully onto the GPU — this engine's GPU math is anchored to the default GGUF/llama.cpp behavior its quant tiers come from; the residency measurements are from the E-series PLE stack, and a direct measurement on a Gemma 4 GGUF is welcome in issue #7.)
This engine models each layer type separately, verified against official HuggingFace config.json files.
What it computes
Total = Parameters (quantization-adjusted)
+ KV cache (per layer kind: sliding / global / linear / dense)
+ Runtime overhead (quant metadata + KV block padding + activations + fixed)
+ macOS base (Apple Silicon unified memory)
Plus a parseHfConfig() that turns any HuggingFace config into the model shape above. (No token/s prediction — deliberately: speed depends on runtime/backend in ways a static model can't claim honestly. Fit is a verifiable claim; speed is not.)
Usage
import { simulate, LOCAL_MODELS, parseHfConfig } from './engine.js';
const model = LOCAL_MODELS.find((m) => m.name === 'Gemma 4 31b');
const sim = simulate(model, /*ram*/ 64, /*ctx*/ 131072, /*bits*/ 8);
// → { used, free, verdict: 'yes'|'tight'|'no', param, kv, rt, os, maxContext, ... }
// any HuggingFace model:
const m = parseHfConfig('Qwen/Qwen3-32B', configJson, totalSizeBytes);
Verification
- Architecture values checked against official HuggingFace
config.json. - Gemma 4 31B full-context KV reproduces 20.78 GiB, matching the published architecture analysis. Reproduce it by hand:
global: 10 layers × 2(K,V) × 4 heads × 512 dim × 2 B × 262,144 = 21,474,836,480 B
local: 50 layers × 2(K,V) × 16 heads × 256 dim × 2 B × 1,024 = 838,860,800 B
total = 22,313,697,280 B ÷ 1024³ = 20.78 GiB
- Calibration: Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B @128K, 8-bit ≈ 54 GB (matches real local runs).
- MLA per-token cost: GLM-4.7-Flash = (512 + 64) × 2 B × 47 layers = 54,144 B/token — pinned by conformance vectors.
All figures are estimates — real usage varies with the runtime (MLX/Ollama/llama.cpp), OS state, and quantization scheme.
Conformance vectors
vectors/fit-vectors-v1.json pins 16 language-neutral test vectors (exact KV bytes, per-token costs, fit verdicts) derived by hand from official config.json values — e.g. "Gemma 4 31B at 262,144 ctx, bf16 = exactly 22,313,697,280 bytes". Any implementation in any language conforms if every vector passes — run ours with node vectors/run.mjs.
Why this matters: the formulas are easy to copy; a verified answer key is not. If you port this engine to Python, Rust or Go, you don't become an untrusted fork — pass the vectors and you're a conformant implementation of the same standard. Port the engine, keep the vectors.
The Fit Census — every model × every device, one truth table
census/ holds 6,000+ verdicts (19 models incl. draft tier × 88 GPUs/Macs × quant tiers) computed by this engine — as CSV/JSON you can import, chart or cite, plus a starter matrix ("biggest model that fits comfortably per device"). Regenerate it yourself: npm run census. Real-world measurements land next to predictions via fixtures/ PRs — predicted vs. measured, in public.
Embed a fit badge
Show whether a model runs on given hardware — live from the engine, one line in any README or model card:

Params: model (name, fuzzy), gpu (name, fuzzy) or ram (GB, Apple unified memory), optional quant (GGUF tier / 4|8|16), ctx, kv. Verdict color: green fits · yellow tight · red won't fit.
Why embed it? The #1 question under every model card and local-AI tutorial is "will it run on my machine?" The badge answers it live from the engine — recomputed when the data updates, not a stale claim frozen into your README. If you publish models or write guides: one line replaces a whole FAQ paragraph and cuts the "it OOM'd on my 8GB card" issues before they're filed.
Ask your AI assistant (MCP)
The engine runs as a public MCP server at https://fitllm.run/api/mcp — connect it once and your assistant answers "can I run X on my Y?" with this engine's math instead of guessing from stale training data (LLMs routinely get KV-cache math wrong — see the 17.8× table above).
- Claude (web / desktop / mobile): Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector → paste
https://fitllm.run/api/mcp - Claude Code:
claude mcp add --transport http fitllm https://fitllm.run/api/mcp - Cursor / Windsurf: add to
mcp.json→{ "mcpServers": { "fitllm": { "url": "https://fitllm.run/api/mcp" } } } - ChatGPT: Settings → Apps → Advanced → Developer mode → add MCP server (Plus/Pro)
Tools: check_llm_fit (verdict + full memory breakdown + fix suggestion — supports multi-GPU rigs like "RTX 5090 + RTX 3090"), what_fits_on_hardware (ranked list for your machine), list_supported. Resources: fitllm://models, fitllm://hardware, fitllm://census, fitllm://engine. Intentionally open: read-only, stateless, no auth, no secrets — every call is a pure function of public data.
Listed on: official MCP registry (run.fitllm/fitllm) · Glama · mcp.so · Smithery
For agents & scripts — plain HTTP API
No MCP client? One GET, no auth, no key — JSON by default, plain text for curl:
curl 'https://fitllm.run/api/check?model=gemma%204%2031b&gpu=4090'
# multi-GPU rigs: gpu=5090%2B3090 · Mac: ram=64 · usage: curl https://fitllm.run/api/check
Open data: the full Fit Census (6,000+ verdicts, CC0) at fitllm.run/data and on Hugging Face Datasets. Try the engine in-browser: HF Space demo.
Principles
No ads. No login. No affiliate links. Output is never for sale. Fit is a winnable, verifiable claim; raw tok/s is not — so this engine refuses speed predictions rather than dress a guess as precision.
Help calibrate
Ran a model and measured real peak memory? Report a measurement — it improves the estimates for everyone.
Built by
yongha — GitHub. Powers fitllm.run.
License
MIT © click6067-ship-it
Установка Fitllm
У этого сервера нет опубликованного пакета — он собирается из исходников. Открой репозиторий и следуй инструкции в README.
▸ github.com/click6067-ship-it/fitllm-engineFAQ
Fitllm MCP бесплатный?
Да, Fitllm MCP бесплатный — установка в пару кликов через Unyly без оплаты.
Нужен ли API-ключ для Fitllm?
Нет, Fitllm работает без API-ключей и переменных окружения.
Fitllm — hosted или self-hosted?
Доступен hosted-вариант: Unyly запускает сервер в облаке, локальная установка не обязательна.
Как установить Fitllm в Claude Desktop, Claude Code или Cursor?
Открой Fitllm на unyly.org, выбери вкладку своего клиента (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor) и нажми Install — конфиг сгенерируется автоматически, без правки JSON.
Похожие MCP
Fetch
Web content fetching and conversion for efficient LLM usage.
AWS KB Retrieval
Retrieval from AWS Knowledge Base using Bedrock Agent Runtime.
автор: modelcontextprotocolSpring AI MCP Server
Provides auto-configuration for setting up an MCP server in Spring Boot applications.
llm-analysis-assistant
A very streamlined mcp client that supports calling and monitoring stdio/sse/streamableHttp, and can also view request responses through the /logs page. It also
автор: xuzexin-hzCompare Fitllm with
Не уверен что выбрать?
Найди свой стек за 60 секунд
Автор?
Embed-бейдж для README
Похожее
Все в категории ai
