loading…
/ru
Cosmetic Regulatory Intelligence vs GitHub
Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers. Pick the right one for Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or Cursor.
Cosmetic Regulatory Intelligence
Structured Safety Intelligence for cosmetic formulation. Query 38,411 NOAEL records, 68,540 pre-calculated Margin of Safety values, and 25,157 jurisdictional re
Comparison
| Feature | Cosmetic Regulatory Intelligence | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Installs | — | 42 108 |
| Rating | — | 4.9 (821) |
| Verified | — | |
| Hosted | Hosted | Hosted |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Category | development | development |
| Author | twohalves | GitHub |
| Repo | smithery-ai/cli | modelcontextprotocol/servers |
When to pick Cosmetic Regulatory Intelligence
Structured Safety Intelligence for cosmetic formulation. Query 38,411 NOAEL records, 68,540 pre-calculated Margin of Safety values, and 25,157 jurisdictional regulatory opinions across 12 markets (EU, US FDA, Korea MFDS, Japan MHLW, ASEAN, Saudi SFDA, Canada, Australia, ECHA SVHC, CA Prop 65, CA TFCA, WA TFCA). Tools: check_ingredient, check_formula, search_ingredients, calculate_mos. v1.1.0: every ingredient response includes full jurisdictional_profile across all 12 jurisdictions.
When to pick GitHub
Full GitHub access from Claude. Browse repos, read PRs, open issues, check CI runs, review diffs — without switching tabs.
Looking for something else? Browse all MCPs or check trending this week.