Fes
БесплатноНе проверенEnables AI clients to perform Sisense environment operations such as governance, asset and user/group management, lifecycle tasks, and health checks using the c
Описание
Enables AI clients to perform Sisense environment operations such as governance, asset and user/group management, lifecycle tasks, and health checks using the calling user's own credentials.
README
⚠️ Experimental Project Notice
Community-Contributed Tool from Sisense Field Engineering
This project is an experimental tool developed by Sisense Field Engineering to facilitate customer learning and exploration of Sisense capabilities. It is not part of the core Sisense product release lifecycle and does not undergo the same validation, support, or certification processes as generally available (GA) Sisense features. It is provided "as-is" — see Support and contributing.
A standards-conformant MCP server that exposes Sisense environment operations as AI-ready tools, backed by the PySisense SDK: governance, asset and user/group management, lifecycle tasks, and well-checks — not chart-building or analytics Q&A.
It works for any Sisense user: every tool call runs with the calling user's own Sisense credential, so results and permissions are exactly what that user can see and do in Sisense itself, enforced natively by Sisense's APIs.
Tools only, no agent. Claude Desktop, Claude Code, claude.ai, Cursor — any MCP client brings its own agent; this project advertises and executes ~100 curated tools (dashboards, data models, users/groups, folders, plugins, health checks, …).
Architecture
The MCP spec's modern shape, as two cooperating services shipped as two
Docker images (fes-auth, fes-mcp — built from one multi-stage Dockerfile
with shared layers):
- fes-auth — the authorization server (AS). Owns everything about who is calling: OAuth 2.1 for MCP clients (PKCE, dynamic client registration, discovery), the browser sign-in page, and the credential vault mapping each issued MCP token to the user's Sisense token. It proxies every tool call to the resource server with the Sisense credential injected.
- fes-mcp — the resource server (RS). Stateless, OAuth-unaware. Reads the injected credential from each request, verifies it against Sisense (cached), and runs the tool as that user against that Sisense instance.
flowchart LR
subgraph clients [MCP clients]
C1[Claude Desktop]
C2[Claude Code]
C3[claude.ai / Cursor]
end
subgraph box [one host - docker compose]
subgraph AS [fes-auth : authorization server]
O[OAuth 2.1\nPKCE + DCR + discovery]
L[/login page/]
V[(vault\nMCP token → Sisense credential)]
P[/mcp proxy\ninjects credential headers/]
end
subgraph RS [fes-mcp : resource server]
T[Tool layer\nregistry-driven, ~100 tools]
D[Dispatcher\nper-credential PySisense client]
end
end
R[(tool registry JSON\nauto-generated from SDK)] -.defines.-> T
C1 & C2 & C3 -- "MCP over HTTPS\nBearer <MCP token>" --> P
C1 & C2 & C3 -. "browser: sign in once" .-> L
P -- "Authorization: Bearer <Sisense token>\nX-Sisense-Url: <instance>\n(internal network only)" --> T
T --> D
D -- "REST, as the signed-in user" --> F[(Sisense Fusion Deployment)]
The seam between the two services is just those two headers plus the 401 contract, so each half can evolve — or be replaced — without the other noticing. There is deliberately no shared secret between the two — trust is the internal network (the RS's port is never published).
Sign-in flow (what a user experiences)
Each user adds the connector once in their MCP client, naming their own Sisense instance in the URL:
https://your-host/mcp?target=https://acme.sisense.com
sequenceDiagram
participant U as User (browser)
participant C as MCP client
participant A as fes-auth
participant S as Sisense
C->>A: POST /mcp?target=<sisense url> (no token)
A-->>C: 401 + resource metadata URL (carries target)
C->>A: discovery + client registration (RFC 7591)
C->>U: open browser at A's /login
Note over U,A: target present → instance fixed,<br/>only username/password asked<br/>(no target → domain field shown)
U->>A: username/password (or API token for SSO)
A->>S: POST /api/v1/authentication/login
S-->>A: user's Sisense token (kept server-side, in the vault)
A-->>C: authorization code → MCP access token (PKCE)
Note over C,A: from here, silent — token refresh is automatic
The client never sees Sisense credentials; the server never stores passwords (used once to mint the user's token, then discarded). Users on SSO/MFA instances sign in by pasting their personal Sisense API token instead.
Tool call (steady state)
sequenceDiagram
participant C as MCP client
participant A as fes-auth (proxy)
participant R as fes-mcp (tools)
participant S as Sisense (target)
C->>A: POST /mcp (Bearer <MCP token>)
A->>A: validate token → vault → Sisense credential
A->>R: same request + Authorization: Bearer <Sisense token><br/>+ X-Sisense-Url: <instance>
R->>S: verify credential (TTL-cached) · SDK call as that user
S-->>R: result (user's permissions, user in audit log)
R-->>A: MCP response (streamed)
A-->>C: MCP response (streamed)
Credential lifecycle and self-healing
- The resource server re-verifies each (instance, token) pair against Sisense
after
FES_MCP_VERIFY_TTLseconds (default 300). A token revoked in Sisense turns into an HTTP 401 within at most that window. - fes-auth treats an RS 401 as credential dead: it deletes the vault entry and re-challenges the MCP client, whose next move is to re-run the sign-in flow. Server-side revocation therefore propagates with no manual steps.
- Sessions are in-memory by design (no database): restarting fes-auth
signs everyone out — each user's next call pops the browser login again
(with
?target=set, that's just username/password). Restarting fes-mcp is invisible: it holds no state.
Deployment (docker compose)
docker compose up --build
This builds the two images (docker build --target fes-auth|fes-mcp) and
publishes only fes-auth on :8200; fes-mcp stays internal. Terminate TLS in
front (ALB / nginx / Caddy) — MCP clients require HTTPS for OAuth — and set
FES_MCP_PUBLIC_URL to that public URL:
FES_MCP_PUBLIC_URL=https://your-host.example.com docker compose up -d --build
Users then add https://your-host.example.com/mcp?target=https://their-instance.sisense.com
as a custom connector. The ?target= part is optional — without it the login
page asks for the Sisense URL as a third field.
Endpoints on fes-auth: /mcp (proxied MCP), /login, /.well-known/* +
/authorize + /token + /register (OAuth 2.1), / (status), /healthz.
Hardening included: per-IP login rate limiting, CSRF-protected login form,
access logs with request ids.
Quick start (local dev)
Requires Python 3.11+ and uv. Local dev skips
the AS entirely: stdio transport defaults to env auth — one credential from
.env, everything runs as you.
uv sync
cp .env.example .env # set SISENSE_DOMAIN / SISENSE_TOKEN
uv run fes-mcp # stdio transport
MCP client config (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"sisense": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["run", "--directory", "/absolute/path/to/fes_mcp", "fes-mcp"]
}
}
}
To run the full split locally without Docker:
FES_MCP_TRANSPORT=http uv run fes-mcp & # RS on :8200 (upstream auth)
FES_MCP_PORT=8300 FES_MCP_RS_URL=http://127.0.0.1:8200 uv run fes-auth
# connector: http://127.0.0.1:8300/mcp?target=https://your.sisense.com
Layout
src/fes_mcp/—settings(env config) ·registry(load/filter) ·dispatcher(per-credential SDK dispatch) ·upstream(RS credential verification) ·auth(OAuth provider + login page) ·authserver(fes-auth service + proxy) ·middleware(access logs) ·server(FastMCP assembly)config/tools.registry.with_examples.json— auto-generated tool registry. Never handwritten; regenerate with./refresh_registry.shwhen PySisense updates.config/allowlist.txt— the curated tool surface, one tool per line. Delete/comment a line to remove a tool. Tools not listed are never exposed, so registry refreshes can't silently widen the surface. (Migration tools are deliberately not listed — they need a dual-instance connection this server doesn't model.)- Mutating tools are gated behind
FES_MCP_ALLOW_MUTATIONS=true— see Security for the full mutation safeguards.
Technical and security considerations
Credential handling
The MCP client never sees Sisense credentials, and the server never stores
passwords — a password is used once against Sisense's login API to mint the
user's own token, then discarded. Sisense tokens live in fes-auth's in-memory
vault, keyed to the MCP access token, and survive refresh rotation. In dev
mode the single env credential (SISENSE_DOMAIN/SISENSE_TOKEN) stays on
your machine. Nothing is persisted to disk: a fes-auth restart wipes the
vault (everyone re-signs-in) — the deliberate trade for having no database
and no encryption-at-rest surface.
Hardening on the hosted surface: per-IP login rate limiting, CSRF-protected login form, access logs with request ids, and per-call tool logs (tool / user domain / outcome / duration).
Authorization
Nothing custom: authorization is Sisense's job. Every tool call runs with the calling user's own Sisense token, so Sisense enforces their real permissions on every API call and permission errors surface to the client verbatim. This is also why the server is not admin-only — any Sisense user gets exactly their own scope.
Trust between the two services
fes-auth ↔ fes-mcp trust is network-level: no shared secret. The RS's port
must never be reachable from outside the internal network (compose publishes
only fes-auth). Defense in depth: FES_MCP_ALLOWED_SISENSE_ORIGINS pins
which Sisense origins the RS will accept in X-Sisense-Url.
Mutations
Mutating tools are exposed only when FES_MCP_ALLOW_MUTATIONS=true, always
carry destructiveHint, are blocked server-side as a second layer when
disabled, and are written to a mutation audit log.
On top of that, mutating tools ask the human for approval before executing —
via MCP elicitation, on clients that declare the capability (Claude Code,
Cursor, VS Code). A proceed/abort dialog opens mid-call disclosing the exact
arguments; abort or decline changes nothing. On clients without elicitation
(Claude Desktop, claude.ai) the call proceeds normally and the client's own
tool-approval flow plus the destructiveHint annotation are the safeguard,
as for any MCP server.
Proceeding without the dialog is a deliberate decision (fail-open), not an oversight: elicitation is an optional client capability and can be auto-answered by a misbehaving client, so it is treated strictly as UX — the authorization boundary is always the user's own Sisense permissions.
Data flow to the LLM provider
This server has no summarization or data-redaction layer: every tool result —
full rows, not {ok, count} metadata — is returned to the MCP client and
lands in the model's context. That is by design and is what makes multi-step
tool chaining work: the model can only reason over, filter, and feed one
tool's output into the next call if it actually sees the data.
The consequence: whoever connects this server to an MCP client is accepting that Sisense data (dashboard contents, query results, user lists, …) flows to that client's LLM provider — e.g. Anthropic, for Claude — under their own terms with that provider. The server cannot enforce or scope this; it is a per-deployment acceptance to make consciously.
Recommended usage guidelines
- Start read-only: keep
FES_MCP_ALLOW_MUTATIONS=false(the default) until you've built confidence in a non-production environment. - Curate
config/allowlist.txtdown to the tools your deployment actually needs — fewer tools means less data exposure and a clearer approval story. - Prefer non-production Sisense instances while exploring; the tools are only as safe as the signed-in user's permissions.
- Test destructive operations with an MCP client that supports elicitation (Claude Code, Cursor) so you see the confirmation dialogs.
Configuration
| Variable | Default | Used by | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
SISENSE_DOMAIN / SISENSE_TOKEN |
— | fes-mcp | dev-mode (env) credential |
SISENSE_SSL_VERIFY |
true |
both | verify TLS when calling Sisense |
FES_MCP_AUTH |
by transport: http ⇒ upstream, stdio ⇒ env |
fes-mcp | credential source |
FES_MCP_TRANSPORT |
stdio |
fes-mcp | stdio or http |
FES_MCP_HOST / FES_MCP_PORT |
127.0.0.1 / 8200 |
both | HTTP bind |
FES_MCP_PUBLIC_URL |
— | fes-auth | public base URL (OAuth discovery/redirects) |
FES_MCP_RS_URL |
— | fes-auth | the resource server to proxy tool calls to |
FES_MCP_VERIFY_TTL |
300 |
fes-mcp | seconds a verified (instance, token) pair is trusted |
FES_MCP_ALLOWED_SISENSE_ORIGINS |
— (accept any) | fes-mcp | exact-match allowlist for X-Sisense-Url |
FES_MCP_TOOLS |
config/allowlist.txt |
fes-mcp | comma-separated tool_ids / modules override |
FES_MCP_ALLOW_MUTATIONS |
false |
fes-mcp | expose mutating tools |
FES_MCP_REGISTRY_PATH |
bundled registry | fes-mcp | alternate registry JSON |
FES_MCP_LOG_LEVEL |
INFO |
both | log verbosity (stderr only) |
Tests
uv run python -m pytest
(python -m matters: it puts the repo root on sys.path, which the test
modules' from tests.conftest import … imports rely on.)
49 tests, no network and no credentials needed (Sisense and the SDK are
mocked): registry selection, dispatcher validation/errors, MCP round-trips,
mutation confirmation (approve/abort/decline/no-capability), upstream
credential verification (injected headers, 401 contract, origin allowlist,
TTL revocation), and the complete AS+RS split — OAuth dance with and without
?target=, discovery metadata, proxied tool calls, refresh rotation,
self-healing on Sisense-side revocation, plus the abuse paths (forged CSRF,
brute-force rate limit, expired sessions).
Registry regeneration
./refresh_registry.sh # rebuild config/ from the installed PySisense SDK
New SDK methods land in the registry but stay hidden until explicitly
added to config/allowlist.txt.
Support and contributing
This is an experimental, community-contributed project maintained by Sisense Field Engineering and provided "as-is."
- Do not open a GSS ticket — this is not a GA Sisense feature.
- For usage questions or help getting started, contact your Customer Success Manager (CSM), who will route feedback to the Field Engineering team.
- Issues and contributions are welcome through the repository.
License
Установка Fes
У этого сервера нет опубликованного пакета — он собирается из исходников. Открой репозиторий и следуй инструкции в README.
▸ github.com/hnegi01/fes-mcpFAQ
Fes MCP бесплатный?
Да, Fes MCP бесплатный — установка в пару кликов через Unyly без оплаты.
Нужен ли API-ключ для Fes?
Нет, Fes работает без API-ключей и переменных окружения.
Fes — hosted или self-hosted?
Self-hosted: сервер запускается локально на твоей машине командой из раздела установки.
Как установить Fes в Claude Desktop, Claude Code или Cursor?
Открой Fes на unyly.org, выбери вкладку своего клиента (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor) и нажми Install — конфиг сгенерируется автоматически, без правки JSON.
Похожие MCP
Fetch
Web content fetching and conversion for efficient LLM usage.
AWS KB Retrieval
Retrieval from AWS Knowledge Base using Bedrock Agent Runtime.
автор: modelcontextprotocolSpring AI MCP Server
Provides auto-configuration for setting up an MCP server in Spring Boot applications.
llm-analysis-assistant
A very streamlined mcp client that supports calling and monitoring stdio/sse/streamableHttp, and can also view request responses through the /logs page. It also
автор: xuzexin-hzMCP-Agent
A simple, composable framework to build agents using Model Context Protocol by [LastMile AI](https://www.lastmileai.dev)
автор: lastmile-aiSpring AI MCP Client
Provides auto-configuration for MCP client functionality in Spring Boot applications.
mcp.natoma.ai
A Hosted MCP Platform to discover, install, manage and deploy MCP servers by [Natoma Labs](https://www.natoma.ai)
MCPHub
Website to list high quality MCP servers and reviews by real users. Also provide online chatbot for popular LLM models with MCP server support.
MCP Servers Rating and User Reviews
Website to rate MCP servers, write authentic user reviews, and [search engine for agent & mcp](http://www.deepnlp.org/search/agent)
mkinf
An Open Source registry of hosted MCP Servers to accelerate AI agent workflows.
Compare Fes with
Не уверен что выбрать?
Найди свой стек за 60 секунд
Автор?
Embed-бейдж для README
Похожее
Все в категории ai
