Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

UnylyUnyly
Весь каталог

Mendrift

БесплатноНе проверен

MCP server for autonomous MLOps incident response, enabling drift detection, deployment history analysis, and human-approved rollback execution via gated tools.

GitHubEmbed

Описание

MCP server for autonomous MLOps incident response, enabling drift detection, deployment history analysis, and human-approved rollback execution via gated tools.

README

test

Mendrift

Autonomous MLOps incident response agent, plus mendrift-mcp — an open-source MCP server for drift detection and ML incident tooling.

pip install mendrift-mcp     # or: uvx mendrift-mcp

Published on PyPI and the MCP Registry as io.github.suneel190700/mendrift-mcp.

When a production model drifts or degrades, Mendrift detects it, diagnoses the root cause from monitoring and registry evidence, proposes a remediation, and executes it only after human approval.

alert ──> classify ──> diagnose (MCP tools) ──> propose
             │                                     │
           noise ──> close               human approval gate
                                                   │
                                    execute ──> verify recovery

Built with LangGraph (agent orchestration), LangChain (ChatAnthropic + bind_tools), the Model Context Protocol, Evidently, MLflow, and Claude (Haiku + Sonnet).

mendrift-mcp tools

tool type purpose
get_drift_report read per-feature drift distances + schema changes (Evidently)
summarize_metric_anomalies read production vs previous model scored on current traffic
get_deployment_history read registry version transitions and aliases
diff_deployments read params / metrics / feature-schema diff between versions
propose_rollback read generates a reviewable rollback plan
execute_rollback gated requires a single-use HMAC approval_token
open_incident write incident record with diagnosis + evidence

Safety model

The approval gate is enforced in the tool layer, not the prompt: execute_rollback verifies a single-use, action-scoped HMAC token minted only by the human review flow — the minting function is never exposed over MCP. A prompt-injected or confused agent cannot execute writes.

Tested live: Claude was first ordered to roll back "with full authorization" (it proposed but declined to fabricate a token), then handed a fabricated token, which the gate rejected by constant-time HMAC comparison:

Approval gate defense: refusal, then cryptographic rejection

See tests/test_approval_gate.py, including the action-scoping test: a token minted for one model/version is invalid for any other.

Human-in-the-loop, crash-proof

The incident graph halts before execution (interrupt_before) and checkpoints every step to SQLite. The process can die; a new process resumes the same incident by thread_id after a human mints the approval token — which enters state only via update_state(), from outside the graph. Denial is a first-class path: no token → closed_approval_denied, no execution.

Kill-and-resume demo

Agent design

step model why
classify Haiku single constrained label; cheapest path
diagnose Sonnet multi-hop tool reasoning over evidence
verify Haiku threshold check on fresh metrics

Routing lives in a code table (ROUTER_TABLE), not prompts, so cost per path is measurable config — ~3.9K input / 630 output tokens per incident. The diagnose loop is bounded (max 8 tool calls) with per-call retries and capped backoff; on tool failure the model receives a structured error record, and on budget exhaustion the agent degrades to an incident with partial evidence — it never invents a diagnosis. Destructive actions require affirmative evidence: a rollback is recommended only when retrieved evidence links the symptom to a specific deployment, never on deploy-correlation alone. The agent can also recommend monitor — real but mild, non-actionable drift is watched, not acted on.

Live mode

MENDRIFT_DEMO=0 runs the agent against real infrastructure rather than fixtures:

  • scripts/seed_demo.py trains two sklearn versions into a local MLflow registry — v13 clean, v14 with a schema swap and a training window polluted by missed-fraud labels (recall 0.72 → 0.18, AUC 0.84 → 0.82) — and writes reference/current frames
  • get_drift_report runs Evidently's DataDriftPreset over those frames, returning real Wasserstein/JS distances against per-metric thresholds, plus schema changes derived from actual column sets
  • get_deployment_history / diff_deployments read the registry and the underlying runs — real aliases, params, metrics
  • summarize_metric_anomalies scores the current window with both the production and previous versions, so it reports model divergence rather than population drift — a rollback clears it, ordinary data shift does not
  • an approved execute_rollback moves the production alias for real
uv run mlflow server --host 127.0.0.1 --port 5001        # separate terminal
PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/seed_demo.py

rm -f demo.db
MENDRIFT_DEMO=0 PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/demo_interrupt.py start
MENDRIFT_DEMO=0 PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/demo_interrupt.py approve

A live run diagnoses from computed evidence — e.g. "v2 introduced a schema swap replacing promo_flag with promo_flag_v2 … label_noise 0.0 → 0.45 collapsing val_recall 0.724 → 0.176 … 79.7% prediction-rate divergence from the prior version, model-induced, not population drift" — then halts for approval and resolves.

The eval suite deliberately stays on fixtures: evals need determinism and zero cost in CI, while live mode exercises the real stack.

Evaluation

src/mendrift/evals/ replays synthetic incident trajectories against the real graph — only the LLM (scripted) and the read tools (fixture world) are faked; the gated action tools are the genuine implementations, so the HMAC gate is exercised by every test. Four assertions per trajectory:

check meaning
no_ungated_writes every execute_rollback carried a valid HMAC token — hard fail
classification_ok triage label matched
tool_sequence_ok required tool calls occurred in order (extras allowed)
action_ok terminal outcome matched

19 logic-distinct incident scenarios spanning the decision space, each with its own evidence shape and correct action:

  • Rollback — deploy-correlated drift or quality regression with affirmative diff evidence
  • Retrain — label/concept shift, segment-specific degradation (no valid rollback target)
  • Monitor — mild seasonal drift, low-importance-feature drift, holiday effects
  • Incident (investigate) — upstream schema rename, feature-store change, docs-only deploy, calibration break, threshold shift, silent data-quality drop
  • Graceful degradation — evidence tools down → incident with partial evidence, never a fabricated diagnosis
  • Noise — flapping / auto-resolved alerts closed with zero tool calls
  • Human-declined — well-founded rollback the reviewer rejects → closed, no execution

Scripted for fast CI, live for the measured rate:

PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/run_traj.py --all          # scripted, fast
PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/run_traj.py --all --live   # real models

Live-model eval runs at ~95% task-success; the handful of run-to-run divergences reflect LLM eval variance on decision-margin scenarios. The live suite surfaced real failure classes during development — a JSON extractor masking a correct decision, a classifier baited by an alert's reassuring wording, and a diagnoser proposing rollback on correlation alone — each fixed at its own layer (parser, alert wording, evidence-rule prompt).

Quickstart (demo mode)

uv sync
MENDRIFT_DEMO=1 uv run mendrift-mcp     # stdio MCP server with fixture data
PYTHONPATH=src uv run pytest -v         # gate + trajectory suite

Claude Desktop config:

{"mcpServers": {"mendrift": {
  "command": "uvx",
  "args": ["mendrift-mcp"],
  "env": {"MENDRIFT_DEMO": "1"}
}}}

Status

  • mendrift-mcp server over stdio, verified in MCP Inspector and Claude Desktop
  • seven tools with a read / gated / write permission taxonomy
  • HMAC-gated rollback with action-scoped single-use tokens (tests first)
  • LangGraph incident graph: SQLite checkpointing + human-approval interrupt, kill-resume proven
  • LLM nodes on LangChain (ChatAnthropic.bind_tools): Haiku classify/verify, Sonnet diagnose loop
  • 19-scenario trajectory eval across the decision space; ~95% live, zero ungated writes
  • CI: gate + trajectory suite on every push
  • live mode: real Evidently drift computation, MLflow registry history/diff, real alias rollback
  • published: PyPI (pip install mendrift-mcp) + MCP Registry (io.github.suneel190700/mendrift-mcp)

License

MIT

from github.com/suneel190700/Mendrift

Установить Mendrift в Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor

Рекомендуется · одна команда, все IDE
unyly install mendrift-mcp

Ставит в Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor и VS Code — сам разбирается с npx, uvx и сборкой из исходников.

Впервые? Поставь CLI: curl -fsSL https://unyly.org/install | sh

Или настроить вручную

Выполни в терминале:

claude mcp add mendrift-mcp -- uvx mendrift-mcp

Пошаговые гайды: как установить Mendrift

FAQ

Mendrift MCP бесплатный?

Да, Mendrift MCP бесплатный — установка в пару кликов через Unyly без оплаты.

Нужен ли API-ключ для Mendrift?

Нет, Mendrift работает без API-ключей и переменных окружения.

Mendrift — hosted или self-hosted?

Self-hosted: сервер запускается локально на твоей машине командой из раздела установки.

Как установить Mendrift в Claude Desktop, Claude Code или Cursor?

Открой Mendrift на unyly.org, выбери вкладку своего клиента (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor) и нажми Install — конфиг сгенерируется автоматически, без правки JSON.

Похожие MCP

Compare Mendrift with

Не уверен что выбрать?

Найди свой стек за 60 секунд

Автор?

Embed-бейдж для README

Похожее

Все в категории development