loading…
Search for a command to run...
loading…
Provides structured templates for security questionnaires, RFP responses, and competitive battlecards to help AI agents and sales engineers draft responses effi
Provides structured templates for security questionnaires, RFP responses, and competitive battlecards to help AI agents and sales engineers draft responses efficiently.
Drop-in templates for security questionnaires (SOC2, ISO27001, HIPAA, GDPR, NIST CSF, PCI-DSS), RFP responses, and competitive battlecards. For AI sales agents and human sales engineers.
Built from 10+ years of B2B enterprise sales experience.
Disclaimer. Outputs are structured starting templates based on publicly-documented security frameworks. They are NOT (a) a substitute for the actual content of your security program, (b) legal advice, (c) a certified audit attestation, (d) a guarantee of compliance. Replace bracketed placeholders with your specific facts. Have qualified security and legal counsel review before submitting any actual RFP or questionnaire response.
Mid-market B2B SaaS sales engineering teams burn 100-300 hours per quarter answering the same security and RFP questions. Loopio and Responsive sell point solutions for this at $30-100K/year per company.
AI agents can do this work better — but they need a structured library of starting templates to draft from. This MCP provides that library.
Use case: an AI agent receives a 200-question security questionnaire. It calls this MCP for each question, gets a starting template, fills in customer-specific facts, and submits a draft for human review.
| Tool | What it returns |
|---|---|
get_security_attestation |
SOC2 / ISO27001 / HIPAA / GDPR / NIST CSF / PCI-DSS attestation templates with placeholders |
get_questionnaire_response |
10 common security questionnaire questions with template responses (encryption, access control, vulnerability mgmt, IR, retention, sub-processors, residency, SLA, AI usage) |
get_rfp_response_template |
7 common RFP sections (overview, architecture, integrations, pricing, SLA, competitive displacement, references) |
get_competitive_battlecard |
3 competitive scenarios (vs legacy incumbent, vs modern competitor, vs DIY internal build) |
search_questionnaire |
Free-text search across all questionnaire topics |
list_all_topics |
Discovery — all available frameworks, topics, sections, scenarios |
get_full_pack |
Complete library for fine-tuning or full agent context |
// Customer questionnaire asks: "What encryption do you use for data at rest?"
mcp.call("get_questionnaire_response", { topic: "encryption_at_rest" });
// Returns starting template with placeholders for KMS provider, rotation cadence
// RFP needs a competitive section vs Salesforce
mcp.call("get_competitive_battlecard", { scenario: "vs_legacy_incumbent" });
// Returns differentiation pattern, common objections + responses, pricing play
SOC 2 Type II · ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · HIPAA · GDPR · NIST CSF 2.0 · PCI DSS 4.0
Encryption at rest · Encryption in transit · Access control / least privilege · Vulnerability management · Incident response · Data retention · Sub-processors · Data residency · Uptime SLA · AI data usage policy
Company overview · Technical architecture · Integrations · Pricing · SLA & support · Competitive displacement · References
vs Legacy Incumbent · vs Modern Competitor · vs DIY Internal Build
Elisabeth Hitz — 10+ years of B2B enterprise sales experience. Worked sales engineering and RFP responses across SaaS verticals.
License: MIT
Добавь это в claude_desktop_config.json и перезапусти Claude Desktop.
{
"mcpServers": {
"sales-engineering-rfp-response-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": []
}
}
}