peer-review vs Changelog Writer
Сравнение двух Agent Skills бок о бок. Выбери подходящий для Claude Code или Claude Desktop.
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statisti
Turn git history into a readable changelog
Сравнение
| Параметр | peer-review | Changelog Writer |
|---|---|---|
| Скрипты | есть | нет |
| Разрешённые инструменты | 1 | 2 |
| Тип установки | personal | personal |
| Категория | writing | writing |
| Проверен | — | — |
| Лицензия | MIT license | MIT |
| Автор | K-Dense AI | Unyly |
| Repo | K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | unyly/skills |
Когда брать peer-review
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
Когда брать Changelog Writer
Aggregates commits over a range and produces a grouped, user-facing changelog — new features, fixes and improvements — with privacy-safe phrasing.
Ищешь другое? Все скиллы.