peer-review vs doc-coauthoring
Сравнение двух Agent Skills бок о бок. Выбери подходящий для Claude Code или Claude Desktop.
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statisti
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs,
Сравнение
| Параметр | peer-review | doc-coauthoring |
|---|---|---|
| Скрипты | есть | нет |
| Разрешённые инструменты | 1 | любые |
| Тип установки | personal | personal |
| Категория | writing | writing |
| Проверен | — | |
| Лицензия | MIT license | — |
| Автор | K-Dense AI | Anthropic |
| Repo | K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | anthropics/skills |
Когда брать peer-review
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
Когда брать doc-coauthoring
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
Ищешь другое? Все скиллы.