About
Around the World and Complex Must-Stop Airfare and routing MCP
README
The complex-itinerary tool for AI agents. Multi-stop, round-the-world, open-jaw, surface segments - the trips that standard flight search can't handle. When your user asks for 3+ stops across continents, this server answers with routing analysis built on real AirTreks fare-construction data: 60+ carriers, 53 known dead legs, bookability rates measured from 1,400+ real fare attempts, and 20 proven routing templates from actual bookings.
Live endpoint: https://mcp.airtreks.com/mcp - free, no API key, 100 requests/day.
30-second setup
Claude Desktop
Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector → paste https://mcp.airtreks.com/mcp.
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http airtreks https://mcp.airtreks.com/mcp
Cursor
Add to .cursor/mcp.json (or Cursor Settings → MCP → Add new server):
{
"mcpServers": {
"airtreks": {
"url": "https://mcp.airtreks.com/mcp"
}
}
}
ChatGPT
Settings → Apps & Connectors → enable Developer mode (Pro/Business plans) → add https://mcp.airtreks.com/mcp as a custom connector.
Any other MCP client
Same JSON shape as Cursor above (Streamable HTTP). Prefer stdio? Run it locally:
npx airtreks-mcp
Then ask your agent:
Plan a round-the-world trip: San Francisco, Tokyo, Bangkok, Singapore, Delhi, Istanbul, London, back to San Francisco.
One call, one answer: a 6-stop RTW
Your user wants six stops around the world. Google Flights gives up. Alliance RTW booking sites will let them build it, then fail at ticketing. One plan_route call tells your agent what actually works:
{
"cities": ["SFO", "NRT", "BKK", "SIN", "DEL", "IST", "LHR", "SFO"],
"budget": "mid"
}
Real response, trimmed for length (the full version includes carrier alternatives and consultant notes for all 7 legs):
{
"route": "SFO -> NRT -> BKK -> SIN -> DEL -> IST -> LHR -> SFO",
"totalLegs": 7,
"isRoundTrip": true,
"direction": "westbound",
"backtracking": false,
"regionsCrossed": ["americas", "asia", "europe"],
"recommended": {
"approach": "custom",
"confidence": "high",
"reason": "7 legs — alliance fares have <6% bookability. Custom build with mixed carriers is the way to go."
},
"customBuild": {
"strategy": "Mixed-carrier build using alliance carriers, Gulf bridge connections. 1 surface sector opportunity.",
"segments": [
{
"leg": 1, "from": "SFO", "to": "NRT",
"carrier": { "code": "NH", "name": "ANA", "why": "Best transpacific availability. LAX/SFO/SEA-NRT direct." }
},
{
"leg": 5, "from": "DEL", "to": "IST",
"carrier": { "code": "TK", "name": "Turkish Airlines", "type": "gulf-bridge", "why": "Cheapest Asia-Europe usually. IST connects everywhere." }
}
],
"surfaceSectors": [
{
"insteadOf": "BKK -> SIN (leg 3)",
"suggestion": "Bangkok to Singapore through Malaysia. Train, bus, or ultra-cheap LCC. Adds Malaysia and possibly Penang, KL, Melaka.",
"savings": "Saves $100-250"
}
]
},
"allianceFeasibility": {
"starAlliance": { "viable": false, "summary": "Technically possible on Star Alliance but only 6% bookability at 7 legs. Custom build strongly recommended." },
"oneworld": { "viable": false, "summary": "Technically possible on oneworld but only 6% bookability at 7 legs. Custom build strongly recommended." }
}
}
That single call just told your agent four things it can't get anywhere else:
- Alliance RTW fares fail on this trip. 7 legs prices at 6% bookability - your user would build it, hit a wall at ticketing, and blame you.
- The build that works: a per-leg carrier plan - ANA transpacific, Turkish Airlines as the Asia-Europe bridge, each with alternatives and trade-offs.
- Where to not fly at all: Bangkok to Singapore is cheaper overland through Malaysia, saving $100-250 and adding a country.
- What it typically costs:
fare_product_matchputs this trip at $2,500-$8,000 economy on an alliance RTW fare, typically $3,000-$12,000 as a custom build.
Those are honest ranges, not quotes - exact pricing on a 7-leg mixed-carrier itinerary depends on fare-class availability the day you book. For a real number, trip_idea_create hands the full routing analysis to an AirTreks consultant who prices and books the actual ticket. Your user gets an expert who starts informed, not a form to fill out.
Tools
Free (no API key, 100 req/day)
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
plan_route |
Primary entry point - give it cities, it evaluates Star Alliance RTW, oneworld RTW, and custom mixed-carrier builds, then recommends the best approach |
route_validate |
Validate a multi-city routing - alliance rules, dead legs, poison carriers, bookability |
route_suggest |
Get 3 suggested routings by region, direction, and alliance |
hub_check |
Best connection between two airports - dead leg detection + hub fixes |
fare_product_match |
Match the right fare product (RTW, Circle Pacific/Atlantic, Open Jaw, Custom) with typical price ranges |
custom_route_build |
Break complex itineraries into individually-ticketable segments with carrier recommendations |
API key required
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
trip_idea_create |
Hand off to an AirTreks human consultant - creates a trip idea in APEX with the full routing analysis attached |
Get a key: POST https://mcp.airtreks.com/register with {"email": "[email protected]"}
Why this data is different
AirTreks has built complex multi-stop itineraries since 1987. This server exposes what that history taught us:
- 53 dead legs - city pairs that look bookable but fail on alliance fares, learned from 1,400+ real fare-construction failures
- Bookability rates by leg count - measured, not estimated (91% at 3-4 legs, 61% at 5-6, 6% at 7+)
- Poison carriers and hub fixes - which airline combinations break ticketing and what to route instead
- 20 proven routing templates from top AirTreks bookings
No other flight tool returns this because no other flight tool has priced these failures.
REST API (no MCP client required)
Every tool is also a plain REST endpoint - same tools, same rate limits, JSON in/out. For agent frameworks that consume REST instead of MCP:
curl -X POST https://mcp.airtreks.com/api/plan_route \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"cities": ["LAX", "NRT", "BKK", "LHR", "LAX"]}'
Full OpenAPI 3.1 spec: https://mcp.airtreks.com/openapi.json
Rate limits
- Free: 100 requests/day per IP, no key needed
- Registered: higher limits with an API key (
X-API-Keyheader) trip_idea_createrequires a key
Endpoints
| Path | Description |
|---|---|
/mcp |
MCP protocol endpoint (Streamable HTTP) |
/api/{tool} |
REST twin of each tool (POST, JSON body) |
/openapi.json |
OpenAPI 3.1 spec for the REST surface |
/health |
Health check |
/register |
Get an API key (POST) |
/privacy |
Privacy policy |
/ |
Server info |
License
AGPL-3.0-only
Install AirTreks in Claude Desktop, Claude Code & Cursor
unyly install airtreks-mcpInstalls into Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor & VS Code — handles npx, uvx and build-from-source repos for you.
First time? Get the CLI: curl -fsSL https://unyly.org/install | sh
Or configure manually
Run in your terminal:
claude mcp add airtreks-mcp -- npx -y airtreks-mcpFAQ
Is AirTreks MCP free?
Yes, AirTreks MCP is free — one-click install via Unyly at no cost.
Does AirTreks need an API key?
No, AirTreks runs without API keys or environment variables.
Is AirTreks hosted or self-hosted?
Self-hosted: the server runs locally on your machine via the install command above.
How do I install AirTreks in Claude Desktop, Claude Code or Cursor?
Open AirTreks on unyly.org, pick your client tab (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor) and press Install — the config is generated automatically, no JSON editing.
Related MCPs
GitHub
PRs, issues, code search, CI status
by GitHubFilesystem
Secure file operations with configurable access controls.
Memory
Knowledge graph-based persistent memory system.
Template MCP Server
A CLI tool to create a new Model Context Protocol server project with TypeScript support, dual transport options, and an extensible structure
by mcpdotdirectCompare AirTreks with
Not sure what to pick?
Find your stack in 60 seconds
Author?
Embed badge for your README
Browse similar
All development MCPs
