Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

UnylyUnyly
Browse all

Osnova

FreeMaintained

Deterministic code map for AI coding agents: a tree-sitter symbol and call graph served over MCP and a CLI, with no embeddings, network or telemetry.

GitHubEmbed

About

Deterministic code map for AI coding agents: a tree-sitter symbol and call graph served over MCP and a CLI, with no embeddings, network or telemetry.

README

osnova. A deterministic code map for AI coding agents. Ten tools over MCP and CLI.

Osnova

npm version license Apache-2.0 ci node >=22.13

A deterministic code map for AI coding agents. Osnova indexes a repository into a symbol and call graph with tree-sitter, then serves it to any MCP client or from the command line. Same input, same output, byte for byte. No embeddings, no telemetry, and no network connection unless you type osnova update-check. Twenty languages, seven of them (TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Rust, Java, C#) with deep adapters.

Osnova is the Slavic word for base or foundation. That is the job: give an agent solid ground to stand on before it edits code.

A coding agent asks osnova a question and gets back exact file and line, the resolution basis and an omission count; osnova reads a local cache that is built and refreshed from the repository by tree-sitter parsing.

Quick start

Node.js 22.13 or newer. Serve a repository to any MCP client:

npx -y @getdomovoi/osnova mcp --workspace /path/to/repo

Claude Code, one command after npm install -g @getdomovoi/osnova: the MCP entry and the session, prompt and stop hooks, with a backup of each file it changes.

osnova setup --apply --client claude-code --hooks

Or add the MCP entry by hand; replace osnova with npx -y @getdomovoi/osnova when there is no global install.

{ "mcpServers": { "osnova": { "command": "osnova", "args": ["mcp"] } } }
One agent turn in five steps: prompt, footing, edit, settle, review; footing and settle are answered by osnova from the index, the rest are the agent or the developer acting.

What you get back

A terminal recording: osnova warp lists the five resolved callers of click Context.invoke, each with its receiver hint; grep finds twelve .invoke( lines; osnova plumb checks those twelve and reports five confirmed, six name-only matches on other invoke methods and one line inside a docstring.

osnova warp refreshWorkspace on this repository, cut to twelve lines:

function src/api.ts#refreshWorkspace: 70 indexed edges
reach: d1 callers 70 in 12 files (3 dirs); d2 +16 in 2 files; unresolved same-name 8; tests 15
d1 calls src/cli/cli.ts#ensureIndex:78 [import-binding]
d1 calls src/cli/hook.ts#runHook:189,201,223,238 [import-binding]
d1 calls src/mcp/server.ts#createOsnovaMcpServer.refresh:233 [import-binding]
d1 calls test/verification-fastpath.test.ts#<module>:37,47,48,51,53,57,58,64,68,74,78,85,110,114,132,145,154,166,171,197 [re-export-binding]
  via src/index.ts:64 refreshWorkspace -> src/api.ts (export refreshWorkspace)
This does not prove absence of callers or that deletion is safe.
unresolved evidence (8); not confirmed relationships
candidates for refreshWorkspace (1, unverified): src/api.ts#refreshWorkspace
d1 calls refreshWorkspace scripts/perf.mjs:100,102,111; test/artifact-format9.test.ts:76,83,102,118,138 [binding-blocked]

Each confirmed line names the caller, its lines and the evidence that tied the call to this definition: an import binding, a same-file definition, a re-export chain with its hop, or an identified receiver. Calls the index could not tie to a definition are listed apart as unresolved evidence, with the same-name candidates it found and the reason it stopped, so a name match is never mistaken for a caller. The reach line gives exact counts, not scores, and when the list outgrows its budget a capped: line and an omitted: footer count what was left out.

How much of the graph is exact

A call site counts as resolved when the index ties it to one definition through evidence it can name; everything else stays unresolved with a reason. These are the shares on the pinned checkouts under benchmarks/corpora/, recorded in benchmarks/results/resolution-coverage-2026-09-21b.json; the last column leaves out calls through packages outside the repository and calls to builtins, which can never resolve locally, and the reference defines every column.

Corpus Languages Call sites Resolved Share Excluding externals
click all 6593 2903 44.0% 62.4%
cobra all 4374 1980 45.3% 88.9%
gson all 23382 8473 36.2% 56.7%
humanizer all 30517 7798 25.6% 51.3%
pyright all 58578 30070 51.3% 74.5%
ripgrep all 13387 6121 45.7% 71.6%
zod all 53417 21630 40.5% 73.2%

Per-language rows are in the reference. osnova coverage reports the same numbers for your own repository, per language and per reason.

Resolved is not the same as right, so the call edges are also scored against a type checker. Every call site in two pinned checkouts was sent to the language's own checker for the callee's declarations, and each osnova edge was marked true when the symbol it names contains that declaration and false when it does not. On click (160 files, pyright 1.1.414) 2883 edges were decided and 0 are false, and osnova covers 90.4% of the call sites the checker resolves inside the repository. On zod (702 files, TypeScript 5.9.3) 21276 edges were decided and 4 are false, a false-edge rate of 0.02%, with 76.9% of in-repo sites covered. The four false edges are listed by site in benchmarks/results/type-checker-oracle-2026-09-21.json with the method and its limits.

Grep versus the graph

The reason to keep a call graph instead of running a text search is not speed. It is that the first regex a person types is wrong more often than it looks, and nobody notices. Nine call-site sets in five languages were verified line by line; each cell shows sites found (precision / recall), and the method lists what each side got wrong.

Corpus Target Verified sites Text search Resolved graph
click Context.invoke depth 2 13 12 (0.92 / 0.85) 12 (1.00 / 0.92)
pyright getChildNodes depth 2 28 5 (0.80 / 0.14) 28 (1.00 / 1.00)
cobra Command.Root depth 1 30 30 (1.00 / 1.00) 30 (1.00 / 1.00)
cobra Command.PersistentFlags depth 1 12 13 (0.92 / 1.00) 12 (1.00 / 1.00)
humanizer Configurator.GetFormatter depth 1 18 19 (0.74 / 0.78) 18 (1.00 / 1.00)
ripgrep Searcher.line_terminator depth 1 12 32 (0.38 / 1.00) 12 (1.00 / 1.00)
ripgrep LineTerminator.as_byte depth 1 26 26 (1.00 / 1.00) 26 (1.00 / 1.00)
gson JsonReader.beginObject depth 1 10 29 (0.34 / 1.00) 10 (1.00 / 1.00)
gson TypeToken.getRawType depth 1 27 43 (0.63 / 1.00) 27 (1.00 / 1.00)

The graph never returned a site that was not a call of the target. The record is benchmarks/results/grep-vs-graph-2026-09-21.json.

The ten tools

The names play on the foundation image. The CLI uses the same names without the prefix: osnova ground and osnova_ground are the same query.

Tool Meaning Does
osnova_ground the ground you stand on Keyword search: ranked definitions with exact file:line
osnova_thread the thread you follow through the cloth Text search: regex or literal matches grouped by symbol
osnova_outline the outline of one part Signatures and line spans for one file
osnova_warp the threads that hold the weave Call graph: callers and callees, direct or transitive
osnova_groundwork the groundwork under everything Repository map: directory clusters, hubs and hotspots
osnova_footing the footing you build on Task context: definitions, relationships and candidate tests around a question
osnova_settle how the ground settles after a change Change impact: the symbols a diff touches and their indexed dependents
osnova_plumb the plumb line dropped straight through Check claims: which listed call sites the index confirms, and which dependents were left out
osnova_tests the cloth pulled to see what holds Tests: the test files that reference a symbol, or the symbols one test file reaches
osnova_unreferenced threads left loose at the edge Definitions with no indexed caller, each with its leads; candidates, never proof

Every response opens with its index generation, says when the index is partial, and counts what its budget left out; the budgets are in the reference.

Hooks and clients

One global install serves every repository and every client: one entry in each client's global config, nothing per project, nothing written inside your repository. osnova setup --preview --client <name> shows the diff and writes nothing. What each hook prints, when it stays quiet, and what the trials measured are in the reference.

Client How to wire What it adds
Claude Code osnova setup --apply --client claude-code --hooks MCP entry plus session, prompt and stop hooks; --skill adds the skill, --nudge the opt-in grep nudge
Claude Code, as a plugin /plugin marketplace add getdomovoi/osnova then /plugin install osnova@osnova The same MCP entry, hooks and skill, run through npx -y @getdomovoi/osnova, with no global install; updates follow the marketplace
Codex osnova setup --apply --client codex --hooks MCP entry plus the same three hooks; trust them in /hooks or Codex skips them silently
Cursor osnova setup --apply --client cursor --hooks MCP entry plus the stop hook as a follow-up message
OpenCode osnova setup --apply --client opencode --plugin MCP entry plus a plugin: full contract in the system prompt, starting points on each message
Kilo osnova setup --apply --client kilo --plugin MCP entry plus the same plugin
Pi osnova setup --apply --client pi --plugin MCP entry through pi-mcp-adapter plus an extension that does the same

In CI

The action runs osnova settle --base-ref against the pull request base and lists every indexed dependent of the symbols the pull request changed; the report is indexed structural evidence only, so a missing dependent is not proof that nothing depends on the change.

- uses: actions/checkout@v4
  with:
    fetch-depth: 0
- uses: getdomovoi/osnova@main
  with:
    depth: "2"

Inputs and the local form are in the reference.

What osnova does not do

  • No type inference and no dynamic dispatch. Edges come from syntax: direct calls, imports, exports, name references, declared heritage (a written superclass or interface name) and framework routes (a registration whose receiver binds to a listed framework import, with the verb and the literal path written at the site), with lexical binding and receiver hints for TypeScript, JavaScript and Python. Resolution is heuristic and says so.
  • No route table. A routes edge is one registration site tied to one handler; prefixes from mounts, blueprints and controllers are recorded on their own edges and never composed into a full path, a computed path records no path, and an inline closure or a wrapped handler records the route with no target. Express, NestJS, Flask and FastAPI are read; gin, axum, Django, Spring, ASP.NET, Rails and file-based routers are not.
  • That boundary has a measured price. Scored against a type checker on two pinned corpora, the calls osnova does not resolve are mostly calls whose receiver type is never written down: 2945 of 6359 missed sites on zod and 164 of 307 on click are a plain name carrying no annotation, and another 1478 on zod are a call result or a property chain. Only 349 missed sites on zod and 10 on click have a type written at the receiver's declaration, and 248 of those 349 are a single library idiom. Resolving every one of them would move recall from 76.9% to 78.2% on zod and from 90.4% to 90.7% on click, so the boundary costs roughly one recall point rather than ten. The full census is in benchmarks/results/receiver-boundary-census-2026-09-21.json.
  • No semantic search. osnova_ground is fielded lexical ranking over definitions. It is fast, deterministic and explainable, and it will not match a paraphrase.
  • No proof of safety. An empty caller list means the index found no caller, not that none exists.
  • No cost claims. Agent trials so far show correctness parity with and without the graph on small tasks. A benchmark that separates the two is in progress.

How it stays honest

  • Every query refreshes the index from the working tree first, uncommitted edits included, and reports its generation.
  • Every clipped output says how much was clipped. Every ranked list says how many candidates it dropped. Partial indexes say so on every response.
  • Every hit carries a file:line span, a source hash and an index generation, so you can check what the agent cites.
  • Every benchmark result in benchmarks/results/ is frozen with its corpus fingerprint, and rejected experiments stay on record next to accepted ones.
  • The cache verifies a SHA-256 over the structural core before parsing it and hash-checks each source text on read. Nothing is written outside it.

CLI

Every tool is a subcommand: osnova build <root>, osnova warp <symbol>, osnova settle --base-ref <ref>, plus coverage, check, doctor, setup and mcp. The full list is in the reference.

Library

import { buildIndex, ask, callersDetailed, renderMapCard } from "@getdomovoi/osnova". The structured APIs return complete results with omission counts; the text budgets apply to CLI and MCP presentation only. Every export is in the reference.

Contributing

Bug reports, language adapters, benchmark corpora and agent trials are all welcome. Read CONTRIBUTING.md for the gates a change must pass: lint, typecheck, tests, build, perf budgets and package smoke.

pnpm install
pnpm lint && pnpm typecheck && pnpm test && pnpm build && pnpm perf

Determinism is the core invariant. A change that makes incremental refresh differ from a full rebuild by one byte is a bug.

License

Apache-2.0

from github.com/getdomovoi/osnova

Install Osnova in Claude Desktop, Claude Code & Cursor

Recommended · one command, every IDE
unyly install osnova

Installs into Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor & VS Code — handles npx, uvx and build-from-source repos for you.

First time? Get the CLI: curl -fsSL https://unyly.org/install | sh

Or configure manually

Run in your terminal:

claude mcp add osnova -- npx -y @getdomovoi/osnova

Step-by-step: how to install Osnova

FAQ

Is Osnova MCP free?

Yes, Osnova MCP is free — one-click install via Unyly at no cost.

Does Osnova need an API key?

No, Osnova runs without API keys or environment variables.

Is Osnova hosted or self-hosted?

Self-hosted: the server runs locally on your machine via the install command above.

How do I install Osnova in Claude Desktop, Claude Code or Cursor?

Open Osnova on unyly.org, pick your client tab (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor) and press Install — the config is generated automatically, no JSON editing.

Related MCPs

Compare Osnova with

Not sure what to pick?

Find your stack in 60 seconds

Author?

Embed badge for your README

Browse similar

All development MCPs